Campaign fundraising strategy

Individuals accounted for 36% of 1994 campaign cash in hand and so they comprise an in-chief(postnominal) source of pecuniary resource. Wealthy individuals whitethorn to a fault be encouraged to contribute to triumph ground forces and Democratic ship's company committees to benefit Fazio.

PACs comprised 24% of 1994 campaign funds and, thus, are also a critical source of money. As a member of the Appropriations Committee, PACs in the financial sector defecate provided the greatest bulk of contributions and should again be targeted. Another definitive sector for any representative from California is agri-business, having provided Fazio with $125,000 in restrain contributions in 1994. Being a liberal, labor PACs must also not be overlooked. And tobacco companies have always been an important contributor source to Fazio, although this fact should be muted in the press.

e FECA contribution limits of $1,000 from individuals and $5,000 from PACs and party committees are the most easily recognized and followed legal restrictions on fundraising. Other restrictions are more ambiguous, such as Victory USA maintaining an aura of independence from the campaign committee. Otherwise, the committee whitethorn not be permitted to make independent expenditures. The same is the slick for independent expenditures by the party committees and for "soft money" exhausted by state and local party committees.

l
=

? ? v
s f q ? n ? l ? i 9 g Q d Z

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!