Judicial Review Of A Presidential Election

Running head : NameInstitutionCourseTutorBased on the pertinent points that were analyzed by the US Supreme Court judges who ruled on the Bush v . Gore , 531 U .S . 98 (2000 ) face I concur with the view that regarded Al Gore s claims as faulty (Bush v . Gore . To elaborate my agreement with this juridical ruling , the most significant defenses that the plaintiff (Al Gore ) presented out front the court were either invalid or impractical . For voice , the plaintiff s usage of the Fourteenth Amendment s competent Protection article had some serious faults for being unbalanced . In asset , the demands by Al Gore that the court should rate a statewide vote recount were impractical considering the time necessary for this exercise in relation to the very short deadline forward the lapse of the `safe harbor period .

In mickle of the aforementioned facts , I therefore consider the supreme courts ruling as justifiedTo begin with , it is notable that the plaintiff used the Equal Protection clause as a gambit to gestate the Supreme Court to call for a recount in the entire Florida state . Considering that only 4 Florida counties namely Miami-Dade , Broward , care Beach , and Volusia , were in contention , paying heed to Al Gore s demands would unnecessarily draw uninvolved parties into the issue . In extension , the provisions of same Equal Protection Clause would be violated since the electorate would not be accorded equal testimonial . This concept makes...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper