.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Sexual Harassment Law

Sexual Harassment

The employee has a legally viable margin call for both quid pro quo and incompatible environment sexual harassment. The supervisor in the scenario offered the employee a promotion if she shared a room with him on a business trip and showed him her breasts. expedition requirements were not a part of the employees job description, provided were enforced by the supervisor in order to appropriate advantage of the employees situation. Upon denying the supervisors request, the employee was demoted to the mail room and received a decrease in pay. The action taken by the supervisor, piece of work promotion in exchange for sexual activity and retribution for refusing the offer, clearly describes quid pro quo sexual harassment. The employees get meets all of the elements for quid pro quo sexual harassment (Bennett-Alexander & adenosine monophosphate; Dawn, 414).
The employee also has a legally viable select for hostile environment sexual harassment due to her male confreres permeative behavior. The male co-workers behavior was pervasive in that he go along to make comments about the employees body after she continually asked him to stop. The employee also addressed her co-workers behavior and asked him to stop, making it clear that his actions were unwelcome.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

The co-worker took things further by stealing the picture of the employee in her drift suite from her desk, scanning it, and using it as his backcloth background. He also created a folder with the employees name, which contained computer altered pictures of her nude. The employee brought the harassment to her supervisors attention, whom did not perform whatsoever investigations. It appeared the supervisor asked the harasser to take down the picture of the employee from his desktop background and use a computer protected cry (Bennett-Alexander & Dawn, 415-17).
The harassed employee belongs to a protected class and in person finds the actions of her male co-worker to be pervasive and humiliating. The employee could also claim that the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment