Business Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2

Business Law - Essay frameworkOne of the channels that illustrate the fate of john in seeking a help on his consumer rights is the consumer statutes (Tillson, 2012). One of the consumer righteousnesss in United Kingdom is stipulated under the Sales of Goods Act as of 1979. Owing to the exchange transaction that the buyer and the seller underwent, a number of provisions under the statute give caper a chance in seeking a legal redress on the damages he suffered. Even though John and the seller did not enter the shoot to sale of the knock off convergence in writing, the sales act under section 4 (1) recognizes that the sale can be entered in writing or orally (Tillson, 2012). At the time John bought the estimables from the seller, the decision on the type of the unload to buy was based on the brochure descriptions supplied by the seller. This implied that the good that was to be supplied by the seller was rigorously to be sold as described. Thus, the seller should have supplie d the design of the shed that John selected among the other designs for it to be accepted. Indeed, the sales act under section 13 demands that the goods supplied to the buyers should correspond with the description of their choice (Tillson, 2012). Even though the brochure was applied as, a sample in describing the design of the shed to be supplied by the seller, the law requires that the good supplied should conform to the descriptions of the buyer under section 13(1). Consequently, the failure by the seller to supply the shed description that John described gives him the right to claim for damages from the sales contract entered. Indeed, in spring case between Re Moore vs. Landauer, it illustrates that the goods sold under description should be supplied under the description that was given. Re Moore Company had contracted Landauer firm to supply tins packed in cases of 30 units. Landauer supplied the containers in the correct quantities unless a number of them had 24 tins. Accord ingly, the court ruled that the supplier violated the contract description by dint of the packaging method described by Re Moore Company. Similarly, even though Shed R Us business had supplied the shed product, the seller violated the contract description since Shed D description was portion of the contract. Moreover, the Arcos vs. Ronaasen ruling upheld that the failure of the seller to supply half-inch thick staves by supplying 9-16 inch thick was a violation of the contract description. The failure by Shed R Us business to supply a shed that fitted the description of John was violation of the sales contract that gives John the legal right to be compensated for the wrongful doing of the seller. Indeed, under the implied terms of sales contract, a failure by the seller to roll the musing bargained by the buyer in the sales contract renders the buyer to seek the refund of the procure price in total. Owing to the fact that John paid a price as the consideration for the shed unde r description D, he has the right to claim the money back (Tillson, 2012). This is because the consideration beat for acquiring the right property had failed even if shed description B had been supplied. To the extent that the good that was supplied to John was not conforming to the consideration amount paid, the consideration is considered to have failed under the implied terms of sales contract (Tillson, 2012). Section 14(2) of the sales act provides that the goods that a business sells should be of satisfactory quality. The description and price of the good is taken as the standard of a satisfactory qual