There are diametric kinds of texts that are focus with the same main topic, tho each author is unique, having their own techniques and styles to illustrate their rudimentary idea to the audience. In Julia Smiths, Canis lupus, the author tends to let her commentators narrow about a wolfs life in a strong organized quick outline with straightforward descriptions making it easier for the reader to learn about this species. In the other hand, in Barry Lopezs, wildcat Notes, the life of a wolf is narrated into spots from his birth to matureness which has a story or dairy content. In two texts, the authors illustrate the same topic, but in a different context allowing the reader to notice the knowledge about the wolf that each author is trying to impart and the different do of oral communication.
First of all, by evaluating two texts, the reader can notice that their central idea is on the characteristics, reproduction, food habit, and behavior of the grey-haired wolf, but are worded out differently. Having a glimpse at both texts there is a major difference in language and structure. In Canis Lupus, Julia Smith talks about the gray wolf in general, mentioning their physical appearance, lifestyle, and how they have an affect on humans. Also, her article has an outline format which makes it easier for the reader to track the want section.
Smith article can be consider as a scientific article because she gives a brief categories detail summary and has references information supporting her research. Not only she accentuates on the physical appearance and behavior, but she elaborates on the topic of preservation and positive and negative affect of economics importance for humans. separately section gives information that is more generally precise. For instance, Smith says, The wolfs interpolate in size based...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment