Curative Petition

exacting beg of India Supreme Court of India Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr on 10 April, 2002 Author: J Syed Quadri remove: S Bharucha, S Quadri, U C Banerjee, S Variava, S V Patil CASE nary(prenominal): judicial judicial writ Petition (civil) 509 of 1997 PETITIONER: RUPA ASHOK HURRA respondent: ASHOK HURRA & ANR. DATE OF model: 10/04/2002 BENCH: S.P. Bharucha CJI & S.S.M. Quadri & Umesh C. Banerjee & S.N. Variava & Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT WI T H (W.P.(C)No.245/1999, W.P.(C) No.338/2000, W.P.(C) Nos.325-326/2000,W.P.(C)No.663/2000, W.P.(C)No.680/2000, W.P.(C) No.374/2001) Delivered by Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri,J U.C. Banerjee, J. J U D G M E N T Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.

These writ bespeaks provoke come up to begin with us as a Bench of three intimate Judges of this Court referred the first mentioned writ petition to a establishment Bench find thus : Whether the judgment of this Court date March 10, 1997 in civil Appeal No.1843 of 1997 can be regarded as a malarky and whether a writ petition under denomination 32 of the Constitution can be maintain to question the rigorousness of a judgment of this Court after the petition for redirect examination of the said judgment has been dismissed are, in our opinion, questions which need to be considered by a Constitution Bench of this Court. Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr on 10 April, 2002 Indian Kanoon - hypertext carry-forward protocol://indiankanoon.org/doc/1580952/ 1If you need to get a abounding essay, rules of order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper