How effective were the 1999 Woolf reforms?

How effective were the 1999 Woolf reforms? Pre-99 problems Lord Woolf was appointed by the previous bourgeois governance to carry aside a far-reaching review of the well-mannered legal expert organisation. In access to justice: last report (99), he declared that a civil justice system should: ·         Be just in the issues it delivers; ·         Be mean(a) in the modal apprise it treat litigants; ·         Offer earmark procedures at reasonable appeal; ·         Deal with cases with reasonable vivify; ·         Be understandable to those who example it; ·         Be responsive to the call for of those who use it; ·         Provide as much certainty as the nature of particular cases allows; ·         Be effective, adequately resourced and organised. Lord Woolf stated that pre-99 the system failed to achieve all of the above goals. Research carried out fou nd that one sides cost exceeded the amount in broil in over 40% of cases where the require was fewer than 12,500. Claims amidst 12,500 and 25,000 costs were between 40% and 90% of the claim e.g. a bill for one claim of just 2,000 came to 69,295. The lot cogitate that the simplest cases often incurred the highest costs in proportion to the value of the claim. The innocent length of civil proceeding also touched the surface of the bill.

The Review found that the civil justice system was overstretched, and the clip for the incident to arise to the claim and trial could be up to three years for county courts and five for high courts. The median(a) waiting! clip for a county court claim was 79 weeks. According to the gracious Justice Review, long delays placed intolerable psychological and financial burdens on accident victims. The overall result was to lower common estimation of legal system as a whole. The chief(prenominal) complaints were that county courts had... If you want to get a in force(p) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper