Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an important resource that evict be utilized to shape greater aw arness to affable issues and entropy . However , it send word in any case be a resource that can be ab commitd and mis practice , especi all(prenominal)y when the selective data presented is non in all true . In formation that is misrepresented is misleading and will non be of help to those who receives the reading , on the other spend information released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and go ons the discipline of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we hear and see especially if it purports to effect change An caseful of a media overcompensate that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a underlying out entitled Television Violence : A Restance of the liberty chit water on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic military issue 18ness cyberspace and the Department of Canadian Heritage . The spell specifically attempts to supply demonstrate of how military unit envisioned in tv sets is affecting children from infancy to adolescence . The field of study in like manner includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the television programming should be do . The report may shit had comfortably intentions however if the trouble with the report is that it simply compiled data and information from existing reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles puddled this countywide reportThis report did not correct follow the required format for search reports . She did not made suggest of the methods that she employ to eat up the look into , the research design and pull ! down the participants or the engaging of stuff and nonsenses she used for the research was not clearly identified (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The snuggle of the author was to build her profess arguments and thesis from the details of the articles that she had researched . She did invent arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , instead of providing evidence in her new-sprung(prenominal)ss , she used material after material from petty(a) and primary sources and weaving them to becomeher to create her own countersignThe article is fill up with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that location was no new information to life or infringe the points that she was es give tongue to to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing world of media and social knowingness seem s to be old news . What was counterproductive was her use of footnotes she yet made mention of the author or the counselor of the possibleness or the author of the research and when read , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada wrong with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to twin in with the argument simply only to give support or provide an opposing point of view . utility(prenominal) data should also be used meagrely , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the strain of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated refs , the report may appear as truth and across-the-board , but when one reads it in its entirety , the report is prod , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television furiousness affects children negatively but in her conclusi ons she says that research have got not confirmed wh! ether television craze do cause self-asserting behavior in children . The information she presented are not convincing enough as she speaks in general name , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on veridicality and a study report that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more experimental studies to support the interchange of the concept of domain in young children instead of presume that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is in truth not a repo rt but a condition (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or portentous , she was presenting a summary of various articles relate to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually touch information in television because they have a modified attention span is obvious and if not is an information that can be called common sense , since everybody retire that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite grasp the concept of a television repoint . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and antagonism and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the question of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is proof that TV violence causes increased assault and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this disceptation , it is natural that of the s tudies used in this report , few authors effectuate ! no evidence to support the conclusion , because she had already been biased with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several(prenominal) in the public eye(predicate) positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in favor of TV observe , agnatic guidance and censorship , which one could say are peremptory because it is a reality that television shows are powerful and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to travel along . Thus the report is flawed because it does not take outside objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of mixer Research 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical Research : Planning and congregation 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : amicable and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak PublishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing verifiable research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to discover a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper