The Positive Effects of the GI Bill :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

The Positive Effects of the GI BillIn 1944 the world was caught in one of the greatest wars of all time, World fight II. The whole United States was mobilized to assist in the war effort. As floor was being made overseas, as citizens learned to do without many conveniences of life, and as families grieved over loved ones lost in the war, two students on BYU campus were beginning a history of their own. Chauncey and Bertha Riddle met in the summer of 1944 and 7 months later were engaged to be married. Chauncey was eighteen and a half and Bertha nineteen as they knelt across the altar in the St. George temple five months by and by(prenominal) their engagement. Little did they know that in just the first years of jointure they would be involved with the effects of a significant historical event, the atomic pelt, as well as government legislation, the GI Bill, that would not just now affect the course of their lives exclusively also the course of the entire country.Chauncey an d Bertha honeymooned in the Grand Canyon late in the summer of 1945. Upon returning to cedar tree City, they learned the news that the United States had developed this wonderful bomb and theyd dropped it and it hopefully would shorten the war greatly. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on majestic 7, and the second on Nagasaki on August 9. The official surrender came on August 11, 1945, officially ending the spread over campaign in Japan. The humor in the country was not one of alarm, in reaction to the bomb, but of tired relief. Bertha reflected this attitude. Those people of our generation saw how many of their friends had died in bloody combat with the Japanese so they were grateful to see it ended. The atomic bomb seemed the long-awaited answer to concluding the war quickly.The bomb was not without its controversies and consequences, however. Before it was dropped, king of beasts Szilard, leading scientist in the development of the bomb, opposed it with all his power (Tr uman 68). His determination contact with the destructive weapon caused him and others to argue against its use. It didnt take long after the end of the war for scholars to assess the atom bomb and its potential in future warfare. In the Yale Review, 1946, Bernard Brodie looked in depth at its future implications and limit on the security of all nations.